(!) You say the company is bogus. Will you explain what you mean by bogus?
Manna of Utah has an address in Florida at a UPS Store, i.e. no real office
Maglev-energy licensed the technology to Manna... But the two's websites
are in the same datacenter, and it appears that Manna and Maglev are sharing
resources.
I think it's curious that a for-profit entity would be allowed to use a non-profit entity for their manufacturing / sales / etc. I say bogus because they have no existing products, no sales, no customers, no offices, no employees outside of the four principles.
(2) Overunity is a new term for me. What does it mean?
Putting out more energy than you take in... Can't happen. No closed system is perfect, it takes outside inputs of energy. Overunity is just the fancy term for perpetual motion machine.
(3) Will you briefly state the Law of Conservation of Energy?
You can't get more energy out of a system than what is put into it. Using an electric motor to drive an electric generator will always need additional power to run. Additionally, all heat generated by the motor and generator is energy removed from the system (and not available for power generation). Same thing with friction.
(4) Can You suggest some "other purposes" for which this could be a grab for
federal or green energy money?
There are to many possible scenarios to expound on here. The only good one I can think of is if this is all a smokescreen to hide the identity of a real company who's wanting to produce something totally different and keep the information away from competitors for as long as possible.
(5) If your worst fears prove well-grounded, how will the city or the citizens be
damaged, other than to be embarassed?
90 million dollar city backed bond issue? Was in the KC Star article. Making it more difficult to attract real businesses downstream.
(6) If you have sources of information other than yourself that lead you to doubt,
will you name them?
All data was obtained from Google, Bing, Youtube, ARIN, and other public sources. Took less than 30 minutes to find it all.
(7) Would you agree that whether or not your fears prove to be well-grounded,
this event is grounds for continuing the push for economic development?
This event is not grounds to continue economic development. This situation only points out that significant due diligence is required when pursuing economic development. Time and resources have been wasted on this particular event. If and when this crashes it will make it harder, not easier to keep pushing forward.
But I do think Odessa needs to push, and push hard, to attract businesses.
Odessa needs to keep pushing for businesses to locate and thrive in Odessa. But the businesses you go after need to be functioning businesses with adequate resources and capital available.